ERQA
also: Embodied Reasoning QA, ERQA benchmark
Embodied Reasoning QA: whether a vision-language model understands a physical scene well enough to reason about acting in it — spatial relations, trajectories, state estimation, pointing and multi-view correspondence.
Google DeepMind (Gemini Robotics Team)Released 12 March 2025Live
ERQA — Embodied Reasoning QA — tests whether a multimodal model can look at a real-world scene and answer the kind of question an agent would need to answer before acting in it: where objects are relative to one another, which way something is moving, what a scene would look like from another viewpoint, which item to reach for. Google DeepMind’s Gemini Robotics team built it as a 400-question, multiple-choice test and open-sourced it alongside the March 2025 Gemini Robotics release, drawing its images from a mix of researcher photographs and existing robotics datasets. About a quarter of the questions span more than one image, forcing the model to hold a scene together across views rather than reason from a single frame.
Because answers are single letters checked by exact match, ERQA grades cleanly at scale, which is part of why the Center for AI Safety’s AI Dashboard adopted it as one of its standardized third-party evaluations — an independent run across frontier models rather than a set of vendor self-reports. On that dashboard the progression is a steady climb: multimodal models sat below 50% in 2024, reasoning models such as o3 pushed past 60% by the end of that year, and Google’s own Gemini line has led since, reaching the mid-70s with Gemini 3.5 Flash by mid-2026.
The gap that remains is the point of the benchmark. Embodied reasoning asks for something more than image captioning or visual question answering: a model has to build a usable spatial model of a scene and reason about interacting with it, the same competence a robot policy would need. That the strongest general-purpose models still miss roughly a quarter of ERQA’s questions is a reminder that fluent scene description and reliable physical reasoning are not the same capability.
The set
400 multiple-choice visual questions with interleaved image(s) and text; the model answers with a single letter graded by exact match. About 28% of questions include more than one image. Scenes are drawn from researcher-collected photos and robotics datasets (Open X-Embodiment, UMI Data, MECCANO, HoloAssist, EGTEA Gaze+), and the benchmark was open-sourced as part of the Gemini Robotics release.
Example
Which object should the robot pick to add to the salad? — a multiple-choice question requiring the model to identify the relevant object and reason about its affordances across the scene, rather than merely name what is visible.arxiv.org
Where it stands
Tracked by the independent CAIS AI Dashboard as a standardized third-party evaluation. Scores have climbed from below 50% in 2024 to the mid-70s by mid-2026, led by Google's own Gemini line, without yet approaching saturation.
How the top score changed hands
Best reported score at each point the lead changed hands. Tap a marker for the entry.
- May 2024GPT-4o47%An early multimodal baseline on the CAIS AI Dashboard, below half.
- December 2024o360.5%Reasoning models pushed embodied-scene reasoning past 60%.
- November 2025Gemini 3 Pro70.2%The first past 70% on the dashboard.
- February 2026Gemini 3.1 Pro74.2%
- May 2026Gemini 3.5 Flash75.4%The highest ERQA score recorded on the CAIS dashboard here.
Current best: Gemini 3.5 Flash — 75.4% On the independent CAIS AI Dashboard, which runs ERQA as a standardized third-party evaluation across frontier models.