ScreenSpot
also: ScreenSpot-v2, ScreenSpot-Pro
Given a screenshot and a natural-language instruction, can a model click the correct on-screen element? Tests GUI grounding — locating the right icon, button or text field — across mobile, desktop and web interfaces.
Nanjing University, with Shanghai AI Laboratory and National University of SingaporeReleased 17 January 2024
Before an AI agent can operate a computer, it has to find things on the screen: the right button, the right field, the right icon. ScreenSpot isolates that skill, separate from the harder problem of planning a whole multi-step task. Introduced by researchers at Nanjing University, with Shanghai AI Laboratory and the National University of Singapore, alongside the SeeClick GUI agent in January 2024, it pairs more than 1,200 natural-language instructions with over 600 screenshots across iOS, Android, macOS, Windows and the web. A model passes a question if its predicted click point lands inside the correct element.
At launch, general-purpose vision-language models were poor at this even when capable elsewhere: GPT-4V managed 16.2% and Qwen-VL just 5.2%, while GUI-specialised models did far better — CogAgent reached 47.4% and SeeClick itself, despite fewer parameters, led at 53.4%. The gap showed that GUI grounding was not a byproduct of general visual competence but needed its own training data, which SeeClick built by automatically mining click targets from web and mobile interfaces.
As grounding models improved, the original set stopped discriminating between them, and the field moved to harder variants: a cleaned-up ScreenSpot-v2, and ScreenSpot-Pro, released in April 2025 to test grounding on professional software — CAD tools, IDEs, scientific applications — at native high resolution. At its release, the best existing model solved only 18.9% of ScreenSpot-Pro’s tasks, showing how far grounding on cluttered professional interfaces lagged behind the near-saturated original benchmark. ScreenSpot’s lineage now sits behind most reported grounding numbers for agentic browser- and computer-use systems.
The set
Over 600 interface screenshots and 1,200+ instructions spanning iOS, Android, macOS, Windows and web pages, each annotated with the target element's location and labelled as Text or Icon/Widget. Scored on click accuracy: whether the model's predicted point lands inside the correct element's region.
Example
One item, verbatim instruction: 'access the personal account interface', paired with a Windows desktop screenshot; the model must output the pixel coordinates of the correct icon among many, not just recognise that an account icon exists somewhere on screen.huggingface.co
Where it stands
The original 2024 set is now comfortably handled by frontier grounding models; a cleaned re-annotation, ScreenSpot-v2, and a harder successor for professional software, ScreenSpot-Pro (April 2025), became the versions that still carry real signal — the best existing model managed only 18.9% on ScreenSpot-Pro at its release.
How the top score changed hands
- January 2024GPT-4V / Qwen-VL / CogAgent / SeeClick16.2% / 5.2% / 47.4% / 53.4%Launch comparison on the original ScreenSpot set; SeeClick led despite fewer parameters than CogAgent, though all models struggled to locate icons and widgets specifically.
- April 2025ScreenSpot-Pro launch baseline18.9% (best existing model); 48.1% (ScreenSeekeR, the paper's own training-free method)A harder successor built from professional, high-resolution software across 23 applications reset the field's effective baseline.
Current best: SeeClick — 53.4% Best model on the original ScreenSpot set at launch. The benchmark has since been superseded in difficulty by ScreenSpot-Pro, where no comparably verified current leader score is confirmed here.