Threads

AI and work

How AI began changing knowledge and creative work — from Copilot and ChatGPT to the WGA and SAG-AFTRA contracts and the first evidence of AI adoption depressing entry-level hiring.

This thread follows AI’s contact with labour — what it does to the work people are paid for. It began with the tools: GitHub Copilot for programmers, and then ChatGPT, which put a capable writing and analysis assistant in front of every knowledge worker at once.

Organised labour responded before the economists did. Hollywood’s 2023 disputes produced the first contracts to constrain the technology: the WGA’s screenwriting guardrails and SAG-AFTRA’s consent rules for digital replicas set terms for how studios could use AI on writers’ and performers’ work.

The tools then grew more capable of doing the work rather than assisting it. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Artifacts changed how people used a chatbot; computer use and agents like Deep Research took on multi-step tasks end to end. The first hard labour-market evidence arrived in 2025, when a Stanford study linked AI adoption to falling employment for young workers in the most exposed occupations. Whether AI augments workers or displaces them is the thread’s central question, and that early signal pointing at entry-level jobs is the first real evidence either way.